Alex Jones 1776 Will Commence Again Meme

Hitler took the guns Stalin took the guns, Mao took the guns, Fidel Castro took the guns, Hugo Chavez took the guns, and I'one thousand hither to tell yous, 1776 will embark over again if y'all try to take our firearms! It doesn't matter how many lemmings you become out in that location in the street begging for them to have their guns taken. We will not relinquish them. Practise yous empathise?

• Alex Jones

Ane of the aspects of the gun control debate I consistently marvel at is that Hitler, Stalin, and other tyrants confiscated guns from their subjects, making resistance virtually incommunicable. That certainly sounds similar a terrible, horrible thing (just ask Alex Jones- he'll be happy to tell yous). At that place's but i little problem: it never happened. Hitler didn't confiscate weapons from Germans, but there'southward no reason gun nuts should permit the truth get in the way of a good story, correct?

The propaganda that "Hitler took the guns!!" has been spread in i form or another past, amidst others:

• The NRA
• Pull a fast one on News Channel (then over again)
• Alex Jones
• email chains…always an authoritative source
• Samuel ("Joe the Plumber") Wurzelbacher
• Gun Owners of America

All these folks and more than agree that Hitler was able to solidify the fe grip of his murderous regime in part because of tough Nazi gun control laws. Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership raison d'etre is built on that premise. JPFO even sells posters of Hitler with the text, "All in favor of 'gun control' raise your right hand."

As well bad for them that their argument is based on something that never occurred.

In his 1994 book, NRA caput Wayne LaPierre dwelled on the Hitler meme at length, writing: "In Germany, Jewish extermination began with the Nazi Weapon Law of 1938, signed past Adolf Hitler."

And information technology makes a certain amount of intuitive sense: If you're going to impose a brutal authoritarian regime on your populace, better to disarm them starting time and so they can't fight back.

Unfortunately for LaPierre et al., the notion that Hitler confiscated everyone's guns is more often than not bogus. And the ancillary claim that Jews could have stopped the Holocaust with more guns doesn't make any sense at all if you lot retrieve about it for more than than a infinitesimal.

The truth, unfortunately for the gun nuts, is somewhat different, and they all accept their history dangerously incorrect. Information technology turns out that the Weimar Republic, which preceded Hitler'due south Nazi Regime, actually had tougher gun laws than the Nazis.

Later on its defeat in World State of war I, and agreeing to the harsh surrender terms laid out in the Treaty of Versailles, the German legislature in 1919 passed a police that finer banned all private firearm possession, leading the government to confiscate guns already in circulation. In 1928, the Reichstag relaxed the regulation a bit, but put in identify a strict registration regime that required citizens to acquire separate permits to own guns, sell them or carry them.

The 1938 High german Weapons Act signed by Hitler actually did the reverse of what LaPierre and others fence that it did. The law actually relaxed restrictions on weapons ownership, with the exception of handguns.

(If yous do a google search for "1938 German Weapons Act," you get a fiddling chip of historical truth and a whole lot of breathless propaganda and wildly incorrect history.)

Hitler allowed Germans greatly expanded weapons buying because he ruled past popular fiat. He knew that he had piffling to fear from everyday Germans, and those groups whom he felt might be threats were proscribed from owning firearms. Hitler really did discuss confiscating guns in 1942, only he was referring to understandably confiscating the firearms of the people whom Germany had conquered. No conquering power will stay in power for long if they allow those they vanquished to keep and maintain weapons that could help them fight back.

The most foolish fault we could mayhap brand would exist to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have artillery. History teaches that all conquerors who accept allowed their subject races to carry artillery have prepared their own downfall past doing and then. Indeed I would become so far as to say that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. And so let'south not take whatsoever native militia or police. German troops alone will carry the sole responsibleness for the maintenance of police force and order.

In truth, Adolf Hitler didn't "take the guns," to infringe a phrase from Alex Jones. While I understand the demand for gun nuts to look for something- annihilation- to hang their devotion to their weaponry on, would it be too much to ask that they get their history correct? If they're so obviously and sloppily wrong about this attribute of history, how are we to accept anything they have to say seriously?

Hitler may accept done some truly monstrous things during his reign, but contrary to what the gun basics merits, confiscating the weapons of law-abiding German citizens wasn't among them. Attempts to conflate Hitler's alleged actions with the policies and intentions of Barack Obama are as empty-headed and wrong as they are ignorant and offensive.

By the manner, neither Stalin, Mao, or Castro "took the guns," just that'southward another story or another time.

Pro tip: If yous're going to use history to support your argument, it's generally a good idea to be certain you lot become your history correct. You can give thanks me later.

smithjoaroarry.blogspot.com

Source: https://whatwouldjackdo.net/2013/01/hitler-took-the-guns-stalin-took-the-guns-castro-took-the-guns-except-when-they-didnt.html

Share this post